Skip to main content

Nuclear Energy- Both sides of the coin

I read an article yesterday in The Hindu called 'Why Kudankulam is untenable' by Suvrat Raju and M.V Ramana. I've never heard of them, but they seemed so sure that the Kudankulam plant should be scrapped. They even went so far as to say that India doesn't need nuclear power. What crap. Okay, may be nuclear reactors in India don't produce as much power as promised. But the potential still exists. Actually, we're not able to produce much power from nuclear energy because we don't know how to use it more efficiently. How're countries like France and Lithuania(Lithuania at that!) able to generate as much as 78% of their electricity from nuclear sources? Obviously, they have/know something we don't. And instead of trying to figure out what that is, we're sitting and talking about shutting the whole thing down. It doesn't make sense at all.
BUT(a big one)you can't say the whole nuclear thing's safe either. Fukushima's taught us that. When one of the world's most technologically advanced countries(Japan, if you don't know) faced destruction from a nuclear power plant, I think there's something to be said for the phrase 'playing it safe'. So what's the Dark Side of Nuclear Energy? It could kill us all, period. Either all at the same time(like Chernobyl), or through other means(like slow radiation, marine/air/soil pollution, etc.) End result? We die in both cases. I guess the only debatable point is whether it's better to die a slow, painful death or die all at once. And who wants to get into that debate?
So what's the last word on the subject? Obviously, as many people have pointed out already, India can't just scrap the entire nuclear thing. I mean, come one! If we do that, not only will we be making ourselves vulnerable to other countries like Pakistan, China and the US, but we'd also be contributing much, MUCH more to global warming! Think about it. If we give up nuclear power, we're giving up one of the very few alternative energy sources we've got left! We'd be burning up fossil fuels faster than ever. And the suggested altternative to the Kudankulam plant is ridiculous. A thermal power plant it seems. Way to save the earth people!
So what I'm saying is, look at both sides of the coin. It's time to accept facts. Either we don't have the know-how to make nuclear energy more viable or we just can't do it, for some reason. So let's find a way to make it viable! And for god's sake, it goes without saying that safety regulations should be followed. AND proper places to dump the waste. No, I'm NOT talking about the sea! So figure out the solution to all the problems that nuclear energy faces and THEN start building plants. No need to scrap the thing, no need to use it without knowing how to, either.


sharngan said…
Does that mean you agree, or you're totally against everything i just said?
Anonymous said…
This blog is boring. Like your face.

Popular posts from this blog

I just wanted to post these pics cause I thought they were a little interesting and a little funny.
And hopefully, so will you.

The Historian-A review

It was at a diner in a mall where I first heard of The Historian. I had gone out with my friends and was having dessert when i asked one of my friends to suggest a book. He's as fanatical about books as I am, albeit in a different way. He was a big fan of sci-fi books and he'd told me many other books that i loved reading. Anyway, he told me to read a book called The Historian. Typical, i thought. He was fond of books that blended history with mystery. I didnt think too badly of such books either. Besides, it had been sometime since i last read a book. So, the next day i went to the local library armed with a list of books, with The Historian topping the list. I wasn't too impressed by the cover when i saw the book. But then, i've always followed the adage 'Don't judge a book by it's cover' and i decided to get it. When i first started reading the book, i thought it was definitely going to be be something. It's the story of a young girl who found a …

Parents are spying on their kids-What the crap?

The age of computers. That's what they call our generation. With every home having a computer, one knows how to operate a PC before learning to read and write properly. So, it's quite obvious that kids know how to use a computer and inevitably, the internet. In such a situation, it's reasonable that parents should be concerned about the safety of their children. After all, there are a lot of harmful stuff on the net like viruses and stuff that can affect the computer and worse, even things that can harm a child mentally. I'm sure you all have heard about many children being kidnapped by a guy they met on the net. Chatting with unknown people, accidentally inducing viruses into the PC(or laptop), porn, etc. are a few of the many dangers of the virtual world we call 'the net'. But does all this warrant the measures which parents everywhere have taken?
Newspapers like Chennai Times actually advise parents on how to keep 'tabs' on kids!The nerve of them! And…